Reflection:
This reflection is based on the class I prepared the
assigned lesson-plan for. It’s a second
grade middle-school class of about 40 students and their skill-levels vary
greatly, from novice to advanced. I’m assigned a unit in a book to teach that I
can supplement and it’s mostly centered on oral communications. Of course this lesson is different in the sense
it was much more thoroughly prepared than usual.
However, preparation does not always equal success. How I
planned my lesson and how I performed it in a challenging classroom environment
shows that you can’t anticipate all
eventualities. I wanted to start the class with some conversational dialogic discourse, but the students weren’t very
receptive to my questions and their answers were generally muted or confined to
a couple words. Consequently, I became flustered and moved on from greetings faster than I would have liked. I was
hoping that by bringing up their exams they could provide some anecdotes or
discuss how they did with their fellow students. Having prepared as much as I
did, I expected more focus, but instead I found that whenever I stumbled or
lost confidence in how an activity was going, I’d move on. Thus, I did depart from my prepared lesson,
even if I tried to maintain the basic tenets of what I had planned.
In retrospect I’m disappointed I didn’t try to build on the
answers of individual students. Instead, I was trying to speak to the whole
class, which is pretty much impossible. I could
have been more forceful with my attempts to elicit follow-up answers by giving
more feedback and displaying more energy. I could also have had them talk
to each other about their exams, but being the first five minutes of class I
think I was worried about losing them before I even began. A few minutes later,
an attempt to have students relax and
discuss sports they’re into was a lot more successful, focused and produced
a lot of open, referential questions
that helped establish our upcoming discussion about skills.
Another thing I noticed in reviewing my tape is that I tend
to “dumb down” my speaking in the class to suit lower-proficiency listening.
While it’s useful to slow speech and
gesture more, what’s not useful is engaging in broken grammar as I seem to
occasionally do in an unconscious and misguided effort to have students understand
me. I think this is another classroom confidence issue I have to overcome.
Having students understand my directions is not an accomplishment, when those
directions are delivered in a corrupt fashion. Teaching proper syntax one
moment and then speaking an almost “pidgin” English the next, presents a huge contradiction in my teaching style and
something I should actively avoid turning into a habit.
There were some
successes though. I found by devoting more
time to chunking and repetition, the students became more familiar with the
sentence structures I wanted them to practice and their comprehension improved
as well. As a result, they could have more fruitful dialogic conversations with
their partners when I assigned them a personalization
task, such as asking each other what their talents are. Visual cues and schema were also used to help the lower-level
students identify certain vocabulary terms with familiar pictures.
In conclusion, I think the meticulously prepared lesson-plan
did improve the class, but there’s still problems that inevitably arise, both
in the unwieldy and unpredictable dynamic 40 middle-schoolers bring to a class
and in the personal faults and temperamental shortcomings that I, as a teacher,
sometimes bring to the class. The former will always be a factor I have to
anticipate, but I can work on the
latter.
Perhaps the problems at the beginning are due to your current understanding of 'dialogicality'. Sounds like you expect your students to answer your questions at the beginning of class if they are more conversational and personalized questions. But you're still the teacher (power-distance) standing (proximity) at the front of a class, at the beginning of class. To whom will your students talk? What can you do ton help them speak both freely and somewhat accurately? And how can you help them believe that you care about their contributions to the classroom conversation?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the thoughtful insights, Tom. You're right about the power-distance problem. Difficult to find a good middle-ground between authority and solidarity. I put their examples on the WB and try to build on their answers, but there must be something deeper there that I'm missing. Maybe apply more of the MIC techniques, repeat students' answers more and put more of the focus on them instead of recasting what they tell me and regurgitating it in my own words.
Delete